12-046-AN1 (Jakarta, Indonesia)

  By


droppedImage

Synopsis: On 07 July 12, at 1400 hours, the witness of this investigation was taking photos of the sky with a mobile phone. While reviewing the photos, the witness noticed a strange object in one of the photos. The witness submitted the photo to The Aerial Phenomenon Investigations Team for analysis.

Evidence Submitted: Photo of a UFO.

Initial Action: This UFO investigation was opened as an AN1 – an anomaly that left no lasting physical effects, such as lights in the sky and similar phenomena. A preliminary analysis of the video indicated the UFO was more than likely a Catadioptric Lens Flares.

Investigation and Findings: During the interview, the witness claimed the UFO was not personally observed when taking the photos of the sky – a common indicator of a lens flare. Analysis of the photo also indicated the Sun was within the frame of view, which indicated the likely source of the lens flare.  In an effort to positively identify the object as a lens flare, the investigators obtained the original photo and applied standard cross-section analysis. The analysis of the photo indicated the anomaly intersected with the sun inside the frame of view.

Object Details: Lens flares are created when non-image forming light enters the lens and subsequently hit the camera’s film or digital sensor. The lens flare often appears as a characteristic polygonal shape, giving the appearance of a “flying disk or saucer”.

12-059-FB1 (Grimsby, UK)

  By

droppedImage_2

Synopsis: On 12 June 12, at 2213 hours, a UFO was traveling Northeast near Grimsby, UK. The UFO was captured on a Forscam infrared webcam mounted on the roof of the witness’ home.

Evidence Submitted: Video footage.

Initial Action: This UFO investigation was opened as a FB1, a fly-by of a UFO traveling in a straight line across the sky. A preliminary analysis of the video indicated the UFO was more than likely an artificial satellite in Low Earth Orbit.

Investigation and Findings: Indices checks on several satellite tracking databases indicated the UFO was space junk, more specifically, the Cosmos 1953 Rocket in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The Cosmos 1953 Rocket passed over the witness’ location at the same date and time (2213 hours on 12 June 12) as reported by the witness. Additionally, the magnitude of the satellite was 2.4, which would have been visible on the webcam.

Object Details: The Cosmos 1953 Rocket (US Space Command Catalog No. 19210) was a Soviet ELINT (Electronic and Signals Intelligence) satellite launched from the Plesetsk cosmodrome on 14 June 88. The satellite remains in Low Earth Orbit with an apogee of 583 km and a perigee of 559 km.

12-050-AN1 (Washington, DC)

  By

droppedImage

Synopsis: According to the witness, on 20 July 12, at 2200 hours, an extraterrestrial probe was observed, “zigzagging over the Washington, DC area”. The witness, moreover, believed the extraterrestrial probe was attempting to “disguise itself as a normal star” in an effort to conduct clandestine surveillance of the Washington, DC area.  

Evidence Submitted: Video footage and still images from the video.

Initial Action: This UFO investigation was opened as an AN1 – an anomaly that left no lasting physical effects, such as lights in the sky and similar phenomena. A preliminary analysis of the video indicated the UFO was more than likely a celestial object moving in and out of focus. 

Investigation and Findings:  On 29 July 12, a team of investigators traveled to the Washington, DC area to interview the witness of this investigation. According to the witness, The White House and the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence Institute (SETI) did not respond to the witness’s UFO report so he contacted API. During the interview, the investigators noticed the witness displayed signs of pareidolia and insisted that extraterrestrials where trying to “communicate a hidden message” to the witness. At the conclusion of the interview, the witness indicated the investigators should remain in the area because the extraterrestrial probe would appear at 2100 hours. At 2115 hours, while waiting for the extraterrestrial probe to appear, the witness pointed to a star in the sky and said “There is the extraterrestrial probe”. During the on-site investigation, the investigators concluded the object in the sky was the star Vega and not an extraterrestrial probe. Investigators were able to replicate the video the witness provided by using a Canon 60D digital camera on autofocus and by holding the camera with one hand. After the experiment was completed, the results were nearly identical to what the witness submitted as evidence. The growing and shrinking appearance of the extraterrestrial probe was actually the camera’s optics attempting to focus on Vega. Additionally, the blue and red colors in the probe were identified as natural phenomena known as atmospheric prismatic dispersion, and the zigzagging appearance of the probe was the result of the witness holding the camera with an unsteady hand. 

Object Details: The star Vega is the 5th brightest star visible from Earth and the 3rd brightest easily visible from mid-northern latitudes. At about 25 light-years in distance, it is the 6th closest of all the bright stars, or 5th if you exclude Alpha Centauri, which is not easily visible from most of the Northern Hemisphere.

Case Files Update

  By

We are in the process of migrating our case files into our new website. We anticipate full data transfer no later than 31 July 2013. If you have any questions about a specific case, please contact API at director@aerial-phenomenon.org.

13-020 (Mt. Airy, Maryland)

  By

IMG_0243

Synopsis: On 2012-11-16 at 05:40 hours, the witness of this investigation was driving on RT 26 towards Frederick, MD and saw a very large hovering object. The UFO was extremely bright and had a glowing light under the entire bottom.  The object was oval, metallic, and hovered the entire time.

Evidence Submitted: Original sketches (two).

Initial Action: Case opened as an AN1.

Investigation and Findings: Closed as unidentified

Welcome to Aerial Phenomena

  By

We are not a UFO Club. We are a team of trained UFO investigators dedicated to conducting investigations, research and analysis regarding unidentified flying objects (UFO) and other aerial phenomena. Our mission is to conduct a systematic search for facts to determine whether or not a UFO sighting can be first attributed to a man-made object, natural phenomena, or perhaps extraterrestrial in nature. We accomplish this by conducting aggressive investigative research analysis; and by assimilating, evaluating, and interpreting aerial phenomena reporting. Throughout every investigation, information derived from all credible sources are considered and integrated into our analytical process. If you would like to report a sighting, please use the Report a UFO link.

13-063-AN1 (Sedro Woolley, WA)

  By

ufo-1

Date of Sighting: August 6, 2013

Time of Sighting: approximately 10:00 p.m.

Location of UFO: Sedro Woolley, WA 98284  Skagit County

UFO Report: Husband and I were outside watching the stars , like always. We noticed a bright object  coming towards us. It was  bright white with some yellow with it. It was flying very low below the clouds. My husband had our camera with him and took a picture. The first two pictures would not take. The third and fourth pictures took. It was very quiet, no noise and flying slowly in front and above us then turned towards the east. It looked like it was surveying the area. We have seen this object a few times before starting way back as far as 2010. We were finally able to get a picture of it. On the camera it looks like a bright white object. If you enlarge the picture , you can see the actual shape of the object. Looks just like the ones we have seen on TV. Looks like a flying saucer with the rounded top and slightly rounded on the bottom. As you enlarge the photo you can see the different colors. White with a touch of yellow and some amber. I’am sending the best photo of the object . The object also had a black round area around it. Maybe like, an energy field. See attached photo:  The photo file size was compressed.  If you’d like the original file, email me, and I’ll send it to you.

Evidence Submitted: Photo

Initial Action: Case opened as an AN1.

Investigation and Findings:  Witness did not request an investigation. Case was not opened.

Object Details: Unresolved.

13-061-AN1 (Springfield, MO)

  By

Date of Sighting: 4/7/2013,  7/7/2013

Time of Sighting: 4/7 @ 11:30 pm (cst)        and 7/7 @ 1:20 am (cst)

Location of UFO: Springfield, Missouri, USA

UFO Report: on 4/7 I spotted 4 craft west of Springfield they appeared just as orange dots that hovered in place for a few minutes before accelerating and disappearing out of my site on 7/7 5 craft spotted just south of the same location, same description o the objects,  much different then what I used to observe at night around 29 palms, that was a cylindrical object with red on the top and blue on the bottom, that flipped end over end before accelerating away, that’s been 15 years ago

Evidence Submitted: None

Initial Action: Case opened as an AN1.

Investigation and Findings:  Historical case only. Lackluster witness cooperation.

Object Details: Unresolved.

13-104-CE1 (San Agustin, NM)

  By

Synopsis: On March 8, 2013, API received a package from a witness in New Mexico containing material samples from an alleged disk of extraterrestrial origin that crashed near Horse Springs, NM, on July, 2, 1947. Soon after, another witness, who originally discovered the crash site in the 1990’s, forwarded API additional documents regarding the crash, including topographic maps of the alleged crash site; and a photo of a strange symbol sketched on an aluminum beam that was also found at the site of the alleged crash. After completing an exhaustive investigation of the so-called Plains of San Agustin UFO Crash, we found no physical proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, that a craft of extraterrestrial origin crashed at Horse Springs, NM – but rather, we found evidence that a North American AT-6 Texan did. (Note: click on photos to zoom in)

Alleged debris from UFO.

Alleged debris from UFO.

 

Mysterious beam is alleged debris from a UFO.

Mysterious beam is alleged debris from a UFO.

 

Symbol found on beam.

Symbol found on beam.

Continue reading

13-052-FB1 (Location Unknown)

  By

13-051

Synopsis: On 06 Jul 2013, witness contacted API and provided a photo of an disk shaped UFO hovering over his home.

Evidence Submitted: Photo.

Initial Action: Case opened as an FB1.

Investigation and Findings: API attempted to contact witness for additional information. However, witness never responded to investigation request. Additionally, photo forensics concluded photo was faked.

Object Details: Hoax